Received: from relay5.UU.NET (relay5.UU.NET [192.48.96.15]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id DAA24381 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Fri, 22 Dec 1995 03:43:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay5.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzveo22005; Fri, 22 Dec 1995 03:40:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA15526; Fri, 22 Dec 1995 03:40:36 -0500
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 03:40:36 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <21cdb102.de904-harlock@raindrop.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: harlock@raindrop.com (Mike Harlock)
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Photoshop vs. DPaint
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
> I love my Amiga, but sometimes you have to realize that depending on what
> you're doing, there ARE better programs on better platforms.
I don't consider Deluxe Paint to even be in the running when compared to
high end programs like Photoshop.
Photogenics is a newer paint package for the Amiga which contains a lot of
flexibiliy and useful features of better packages. Between that and
TV-Paint (Picasso) Most of my image touch up needs are taken care of.
neither of them are a total solution by themselves for me, though.
